Skip to main content
 
developerWorks
AIX and UNIX
Information Mgmt
Lotus
New to Lotus
Products
How to buy
Downloads
Live demos
Technical library
Training
Support
Forums & community
Events
Rational
Tivoli
WebSphere
Java™ technology
Linux
Open source
SOA and Web services
Web development
XML
My developerWorks
About dW
Submit content
Feedback



developerWorks  >  Lotus  >  Forums & community  >  Enterprise Integration Forum

Enterprise Integration Forum

developerWorks

  

Sign in to participate PreviousPrevious NextNext


zoltan2 beke 21.Mar.13 11:41 AM a Web browser
LEI LEI - 8.0 Windows


We use TimeStamp Replications for daily pump our data from Notes to Oracle.
Tha appl. server is 8.5.3 on as400, the lei server is 8.5 on windows 2003. The oracle is 10.2g.

We have two serious problem.
1. Some of TimeStamp replications work as Direct Transfer, which means that replicate all documents every time, without reference to the used timestamp (@modified).
We use view at selection option in Notes Connection doc. After a successfull replication this view contains a lot of '1' value in first column (it means, it dosn't have to replicate this doc.?),
so it seems that the activity take no notice of these '1'. The selection formula of this view comes from activity document, where at 'Data Option\Conditional Clause for Source'
we set allways a simple formula (eg. Form="xxxx") and in first column the LEI calculate this sign 1 or 2 according to timestamps.
Very interesting, that we use same methodology when we configure all Replications and Connections documents, some of them work correctly, some of them fail.

2. We noticed that at the target side missing some records or not updated after the replication. These situations also happend with TimeStamp replications.
After replication we examined the situation. At the source side we found (in the mentioned view with sign '2' must replicate.?) the missing document,
but the activity missed to insert or update this record.
Now we use Direct Transfer as a workaround, it allways transfers the records correctly.

We have read related guides and we still don't know how to deal with these situations.






Timestamp replication transfer erro... (zoltan2 beke 21.Mar.13)
. . RE: Timestamp replication transfer ... (Daniel W Heiche... 21.Mar.13)
. . . . RE: Timestamp replication transfer ... (zoltan2 beke 3.Apr.13)





  Document options
Print this pagePrint this page

 Search this forum

  Forum views and search
Date (threaded)
Date (flat)
With excerpt
Author
Category
Platform
Release
Advanced search

 Sign In or Register
Sign in
Forgot your password?
Forgot your user name?
Create new registration

 RSS feedsRSS
All forum posts RSS
All main topics RSS
More Lotus RSS feeds

Resources

 Resources
Forum use and etiquette
Native Notes Access
Web site Feedback

Lotus Support

 Lotus Support
IBM Support Portal - Lotus software
Lotus Support documents
Lotus support by product
Lotus support downloads
Lotus support RSS feeds

Wikis

 Wikis
IBM Composite Applications
IBM Mashup Center
IBM Connections
IBM Connections Cloud Developers
IBM Docs
IBM Forms
IBM Mobile Connect
IBM Sametime
IBM SmartCloud for Social Business
IBM Web Experience Factory
Lotus Domino
Lotus Domino Designer
Lotus Expeditor
Lotus Foundations
Lotus iNotes
Lotus Instructor Community Courseware
Lotus Notes
Lotus Notes & Domino Application Development
Lotus Notes Traveler
Lotus Protector
Lotus Quickr
Lotus Symphony
IBM Web Content Manager
WebSphere Portal

Lotus Forums


 Lotus Forums
Notes/Domino 9.0
Notes/Domino 8.5 + Traveler
Notes/Domino XPages development forum
Notes/Domino 8
Notes/Domino 6 and 7
IBM Connections
IBM Mobile Connect
IBM Sametime
IBM SmartCloud Notes
Lotus Enterprise Integration
Lotus Protector
Lotus Quickr
Lotus SmartSuite