Skip to main content
 
developerWorks
AIX and UNIX
Information Mgmt
Lotus
New to Lotus
Products
How to buy
Downloads
Live demos
Technical library
Training
Support
Forums & community
Events
Rational
Tivoli
WebSphere
Java™ technology
Linux
Open source
SOA and Web services
Web development
XML
My developerWorks
About dW
Submit content
Feedback



developerWorks  >  Lotus  >  Forums & community  >  Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum

developerWorks

  

Sign in to participate PreviousPrevious NextNext

RE: Fitness for a particular purpose
Nathan T. Freeman 11.Dec.02 04:57 PM a Web browser
Notes Client 6.0 Linux - RedHat, Linux - SuSE


Who cares? No Linux distro comes without both, and thanks to widget themes the trend these days is to make them both look the same, so that the user doesn't know the difference. Also, as you say, porting it to Qt would probably make future releases of Notes accross Windows/Linux/MacOS easier.

The *user* may not know the difference, but a corporate support desk sure
will. They're only going to want to support one or the other. The target
market isn't the college CS student. It's the corporate user.

Are web apps worse than Notes apps? Of course not, I've never said that.

Perhaps this is a language barrier, but that's what I took...

Functionality? Next time I'll see you selling used cars as low-cost houses. Hey you can do everything you can do inside a house inside of a car!!

...to mean.

There are many times when I find myself thinking "oh, how easy it would be if I was doing a web app instead of a Notes app". The problem is that Lotus can implement in Notes the things that are good in a web browser. However, I don't think MS or Netscape will implement the good things of Notes in their browsers ;).

Most of this thread has been me talking about how that list of things isn't all
that long, and it's getting shorter by the day.

However, you are wining on the long term and, what's better, if you went for Red Hat and you decide you don't like them, you can change and go for SuSE or Mandrake, or whatever, just in the same way that you can buy IBM PCs one day and HP computers the next.

How often is this really done? Given the continued effort by most
organizations to drop TCO to the floor, interchangable hardware is critical.
Do you seriously think that some IT group is going to want to support desktop
editions of RedHat *and* Mandrake after migrating off Windows? Most
organizations have enough complaints about supporting multiple versions of
Windows itself!

I'm not saying these aren't great OSes. They are. But TCO is not about
license cost. Period, end of story. Ask Ed Brill!

Also, many companies have their IT maintenance done by others (the company I work for, for example). I can assure you that in those cases they wouldn't have higher IT costs because of using Linux instead of Windows.

How can you assure me of that? I can't find a single outsource provider that
can provide Linux desktop expertise as cheaply as Windows desktop expertise. I
can stand on the street and point at someone who can keep a Windows box running
on an IP network. Where's the Linux expert?

Anyway, if you thing a Winelib port would be great, I still don't see why we are argueing, because that's what I've always said from the begining.

Because there's an audience. ;)

Seriously, our best opportunity to see results in this regard is to widely ask
for the same thing. Forget spending a gagillion dollars on a Qt/KDE Notes
client -- just get one of the Win32 translation tools to work with it and cover
what portions of the market have real demand. Then when there's a
million-license commitment for a native port on a settled WM, go for it.

I think a Linux port will have to be done sooner or later, but I understand that IBM doesn't want to risk lots of money without being sure, so I think doing such a port would be the best thing to do.

Ultimately, IBM can do whatever it wants with its money. I'm just scared that
they're going to gloss over efforts that might be considerably more effective.
It wouldn't be the first time. (Anyone remember the Win 3.1 server?)

P.S. I would be happy with a Wine/Crossover effort, but I think a winelib efford would be much better.

I'd be a fan of solving the *easiest* problem first, then getting steadly
deeper in point revs.




Notes on Wal-Mart machines (Andrew Price 4.Dec.02)
. . huh? (Ed Brill 4.Dec.02)
. . . . - or the other way around, Ed Brill... (Espen Ødegaard 5.Dec.02)
. . . . RE: huh? (Jason Collier 4.Dec.02)
. . . . . . RE: huh? (James Greene 4.Dec.02)
. . . . Of course not ... (Andrew Price 5.Dec.02)
. . . . . . RE: Of course not ... (Markus Hubler 5.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . Windows Installer? (Neal Howard 5.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . That can't be the reason (Thomas Gumz 5.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . * I love how Notes doesn't depend o... (Andrew Price 5.Dec.02)
. . . . Isn't it?... re: huh? (Nathan T. Freem... 5.Dec.02)
. . . . . . * Well said. A custom winelet is my... (Andrew Price 5.Dec.02)
. . . . A couple of examples ... (Andrew Price 5.Dec.02)
. . . . RE: huh? (MARK D Davenpor... 5.Dec.02)
. . . . . . Fitness for a particular purpose (Ed Brill 5.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . * I, at least, am not advocating No... (Andrew Price 5.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . * I, at least, am not advocating No... (MARK D Davenpor... 6.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . one reason (Ed Brill 6.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . One way to remove the cost ... (Andrew Price 6.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . who does the testing to ensure comp... (Ed Brill 7.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May I add to this thread... (Salvador Gimeno... 8.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -it could be done even more effecti... (Espen Ødegaard 9.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The licensee of course. Lotus could... (Andrew Price 8.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . It's a very different market ... (Andrew Price 6.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (MARK D Davenpor... 6.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (Nathan T. Freem... 6.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (MARK D Davenpor... 6.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (Nathan T. Freem... 9.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (Salvador Gimeno... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (Nathan T. Freem... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (Salvador Gimeno... 11.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (Nathan T. Freem... 11.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (Salvador Gimeno... 11.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Fitness for a particular purpos... (Nathan T. Freem... 11.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Please let's end this discussion (Salvador Gimeno... 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Please let's end this discussio... (Nathan T. Freem... 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Please let's end this discussio... (Salvador Gimeno... 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Please let's end this discussio... (Nathan T. Freem... 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *Even easier than the trick is to u... (Ben Langhinrich... 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Out of curiosity, why do you think ... (Ben Langhinrich... 11.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Out of curiosity, why do you th... (Nathan T. Freem... 11.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Out of curiosity, why do you th... (Stan Rogers 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Out of curiosity, why do you th... (MARK D Davenpor... 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Out of curiosity, why do you th... (MARK D Davenpor... 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Some of what you say is true, but 8... (Ben Langhinrich... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Some of what you say is true, b... (Nathan T. Freem... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ridiculous (Ben Langhinrich... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Is it?... re: Ridiculous (Nathan T. Freem... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I still say it is ridculous (Ben Langhinrich... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: I still say it is ridculous (Nathan T. Freem... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wait, I never said that a Linux cli... (Ben Langhinrich... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Wait, I never said that a Linux... (Nathan T. Freem... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Here is how your stuff looks in a N... (Bill Ernest 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Then give me the iNotes RT control ... (Nathan T. Freem... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . never mind (Thomas Gumz 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *My sentiments exactly. Never mind.... (Ben Langhinrich... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Right on Ben. I really hate to try ... (Bill Ernest 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . It's not my fault we don't have a r... (Nathan T. Freem... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *And even so the template would hav... (Ben Langhinrich... 10.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RE: *And even so the template would... (MARK D Davenpor... 12.Dec.02)
. . . . . . . . Database Corrupt (srini J verma 8.Jan.08)


Document Options






  Document options
Print this pagePrint this page

Search this forum

Forum views and search


  Forum views and search
Date (threaded)
Date (flat)
With excerpt
Author
Category
Platform
Release
Advanced search

Sign In or Register

 Sign In or Register
Sign in
Forgot your password?
Forgot your user name?
Create new registration

Member Tools


RSS Feeds

 RSS feedsRSS
All forum posts RSS
All main topics RSS
More Lotus RSS feeds

Resources

 Resources
Forum use and etiquette
Native Notes Access
Web site Feedback

Lotus Support

 Lotus Support
IBM Support Portal - Lotus software
Lotus Support documents
Lotus support by product
Lotus support downloads
Lotus support RSS feeds

Wikis

 Wikis
IBM Composite Applications
IBM Mashup Center
IBM Connections
IBM Connections Cloud Developers
IBM Docs
IBM Forms
IBM Mobile Connect
IBM Sametime
IBM SmartCloud for Social Business
IBM Web Experience Factory
Lotus Domino
Lotus Domino Designer
Lotus Expeditor
Lotus Foundations
Lotus iNotes
Lotus Instructor Community Courseware
Lotus Notes
Lotus Notes & Domino Application Development
Lotus Notes Traveler
Lotus Protector
Lotus Quickr
Lotus Symphony
IBM Web Content Manager
WebSphere Portal

Lotus Forums


 Lotus Forums
Notes/Domino 9.0
Notes/Domino 8.5 + Traveler
Notes/Domino XPages development forum
Notes/Domino 8
Notes/Domino 6 and 7
IBM Connections
IBM Mobile Connect
IBM Sametime
IBM SmartCloud Notes
Lotus Enterprise Integration
Lotus Protector
Lotus Quickr
Lotus SmartSuite