Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum : Text display problem/question

Hi,

We have a database that receives questions from another department (through replication) and we then run an agent which transfers these questions over to another database.

The database that receives the transferred questions over is a redevelopment of an existing database. In the 'redeveloped' version, a couple of fields have changed, one being the 'QuestionText' field. The format of the field is ComputerText, with the followin formula:

@Text(QuestionText)

When a user opens the form, the question displays ok to them, but if you look at the field properties, it actually has all the formatting tags there.

If I copy this field to our original database, and then copy one of the documents over, when a user opens the form it shows them the question text, but with all the tags attached.

I'm not sure why the database displays a 'tagless' version of the field to the user in one database, but if I copy that exact field to another database, it displays the 'tagged' version of the field to the user. In each case, the actual properties of the field show the 'tagged' version of the text.

Basically I want the user to see the 'tagless' version of the 'tagged' text in that field.

I'm not sure if this is making sense at all, hopefully someone can help!

Example of 'untagged' field which displays to user:
— MR TRICARICO to ask the the Minister for Planning (for the Attorney-General)
In relation to the City of Frankston (FCC) preferred development model for the Frankston Safe Boat Harbour, also known as Oliver's Hill Marina Project, which was referred to the Priority Development Panel (PDP) on 26 November 2007, and to Frankston Planning Scheme Amendments C15 and C30:
(1) On what grounds did the Minister refer the FCC's preferred development model to the PDP.
(2) Will all documents and submissions in relation to this PDP referral be publicly released; if not, why not.
(3) Why was the PDP not asked to provide advice on the financial viability or the environmental impact of the FCC's preferred development model.
(4) Why was the PDP not required to seek public comment on the FCC's preferred development model.
(5) Why was the PDP asked to provide advice on whether an amendment to the Frankston Planning Scheme (in whole or part) should be approved without public exhibition.
(6) Why did the Minister's summary of matters to be addressed by the PDP anticipate a draft planning scheme amendment before the PDP had provided a final report to the Minister.

Example of 'tagged' version of text it displays to user:
— MR TRICARICO to ask the the Minister for Planning (for the Attorney-General)

In relation to the City of Frankston (FCC) preferred
development model for the Frankston Safe Boat Harbour, also known as Oliver's
Hill Marina Project, which was referred to the Priority Development Panel (PDP)
on 26 November 2007, and to Frankston Planning Scheme Amendments C15 and C30:
(1)     On what
grounds did the Minister refer the FCC's preferred development model to the
PDP.(2)     Will all documents and submissions in
relation to this PDP referral be publicly released; if not, why
not.(3)     Why was the PDP not asked to provide
advice on the financial viability or the environmental impact of the FCC's
preferred development model.(4)     Why was
the PDP not required to seek public comment on the FCC's preferred development
model.(5)     Why was the PDP asked to provide advice on
whether an amendment to the Frankston Planning Scheme (in whole or part) should
be approved without public exhibition.(6)     Why did
the Minister's summary of matters to be addressed by the PDP anticipate a draft
planning scheme amendment before the PDP had provided a final report to the
Minister.

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum

Resources

Lotus Support

Wikis

Lotus Forums