Aug 5, 2013, 5:06 PM
69 Posts

Resource reservation database

  • Category: Notes Client
  • Platform: All Platforms
  • Release: 9.0
  • Role: End User
  • Tags: resource reservation
  • Replies: 8

Why the Resource Reservation template has not been updated? It is even not V8 design, look very R6-ish, users are laughing.

Aug 6, 2013, 8:19 AM
19 Posts
Why not reporting this in a PMR then?
Aug 7, 2013, 10:38 PM
22 Posts
waiting eagerly for an adequate web/mobile interface .... :-(
Aug 14, 2013, 10:20 AM
69 Posts

Why do we have this forum? We can report everything as PMR and SPR.

Aug 14, 2013, 4:32 PM
15 Posts
Forum is for user-to-user interaction.
Since this is a core IBM database design change that you're looking for, perhaps it would be good to let IBM know that you would like it updated. If they receive enough demand then they can move it up the priority list. You can modify the look and feel if you would like to, but since it is a system database you will need to be careful to only modify the look and not any of the functionality. And then you'll have to keep those changes in mind when you upgrade and need to update to the latest IBM template. I agree, it does need work, but that's what IBM Support is for to get this escalated. Ask them to check for similar requests from others and to add your company to that list...
Sep 1, 2013, 4:40 PM
69 Posts
Resource reservation database

Chris, isn't it obvious, if even the Notebook database design was updated, keeping Reservations in R6 design looks strange. It is like no one ever uses it but it is not true. I cannot imagine any ogranization that doesn't use resource reservations database.

Sep 2, 2013, 7:00 AM
22 Posts
Not what Chris's post says
Yes, you are right, and if you are reading Chris's post carefully, he agrees with that. What he wanted to say: Posting your request into this database is not bringing it to the attention of the right people. You should address your wishes to IBM Support instead, so it gets attention from the people, that decide about the future development of the product. And Chris is right in that there are almost no people from IBM Development present in this discussion database.
Sep 3, 2013, 9:26 AM
15 Posts
Yes, that's my point thanks! <eom>
Jun 4, 2015, 5:49 PM
2 Posts
disapointed :(

Botch job ... evolves towards our new fantastic webmail, you will not get associated applications... IBM lack of consideration for customers !