Submitted by Achim Staebler on Jun 29, 2011 10:29:58 AM

Re: Caching with the Web Content Viewer (JSR 286) Portlet

David, you are correct, we've tested this on Portal 6.1.5 and 7.0, both running on WAS 7.0.

I'm going to update the article with a separate cachespec.xml that also works on 6.1.5 with WAS 6.1.

Submitted by Gianluca Bruno on Jun 28, 2011 11:31:44 AM

Re: Caching with the Web Content Viewer (JSR 286) Portlet

Has anyone successfully applied the cachespec to a Portalv7 and WAS7 environment? I was unsuccessful in my attempts with the above cachespec.xml.

Submitted by yang us_ibm_com on Jun 24, 2011 5:11:28 PM

Re: Caching with the Web Content Viewer (JSR 286) Portlet

UGH, formatting is messed up, trying again...)

For Portal/WAS 6.1, try removing these XML lines from the sample cachespec.xml:

.component id="javax.portlet.render_part" type="attribute".

.value.RENDER_MARKUP..value.

..component.

Submitted by yang us_ibm_com on Jun 24, 2011 5:10:15 PM

Re: Caching with the Web Content Viewer (JSR 286) Portlet

(UGH, formatting is messed up, trying again...)

For Portal/WAS 6.1, try removing these lines from the sample cachespec.xml:

/

/RENDER_MARKUP/

/

Submitted by yang us_ibm_com on Jun 24, 2011 5:09:27 PM

Re: Caching with the Web Content Viewer (JSR 286) Portlet

(UGH, formatting is messed up, trying again...)

For Portal/WAS 6.1, try removing these lines from the sample cachespec.xml:

RENDER_MARKUP

Submitted by yang us_ibm_com on Jun 24, 2011 5:07:51 PM

Re: Caching with the Web Content Viewer (JSR 286) Portlet

For Portal/WAS 6.1, try removing these lines from the sample cachespec.xml:

RENDER_MARKUP

Submitted by yang us_ibm_com on Jun 24, 2011 5:06:09 PM

Re: Caching with the Web Content Viewer (JSR 286) Portlet

I believe this article was tested on WP 6.1.5.x on WAS 7.0.

Submitted by Robert Greenwood on Jun 2, 2011 12:11:18 PM

Re: Caching with the Web Content Viewer (JSR 286) Portlet

My attempts at this so far have failed. Is this feature supported for WAS 6.1/Portal 6.1.5? What are the version requirements for this functionality?